Divorce.co.uk

The UK's premier resource on divorce & separation

The court's power to delay pronouncing decree absolute - by Elizabeth Field

 

The Wife in Miller Smith v Miller Smith (No 2) [2009] EWHC 3623 (Fam) asked the Court to delay finalising her divorce until her financial claims had been decided.  The Court refused her application because, although it does have a discretionary power to delay the final decree of divorce, this should only be used in exceptional circumstances.

Decree absolute is the second and final decree in divorce proceedings, the first being decree nisi.  The petitioner can apply for decree absolute six weeks and one day from decree nisi.  If the petitioner does not apply, the respondent can apply three months later.  Until decree absolute is made, the parties remain married to each other.  Divorcing couples sometimes agree to delay applying for decree absolute until the finances are resolved, as there may be tax savings on transfers between spouses and death in service benefits under pensions are not automatically payable to one spouse (usually the wife) upon the other’s death if they are divorced.

In this case, the Wife had relied on the Husband’s assurances that she could benefit from his pensions and private health insurance and so had not taken out policies of her own.  She alleged she would therefore suffer detriment if decree absolute was made before the financial proceedings had been concluded.  She wanted to delay decree absolute to allow her to investigate whether the Husband’s undertakings would provide her with equivalent benefits. 

The Court ruled that it does have an inherent power to delay making decree absolute, but that power can only be exercised where there are special circumstances.  There were no exceptional circumstances here and no disadvantage would be caused by making decree absolute.  The fact that the financial application was outstanding was not in itself a reason to delay the divorce (confirming the earlier decision of Re G (decree absolute: prejudice) [2003] 1 FLR 870).
 
This case demonstrates the importance of obtaining (at an early stage in divorce proceedings) an undertaking from the other side’s solicitors not to apply for decree absolute until the finances are resolved.

Elizabeth Field

You must be a registered subscriber in order to view this Article.
To learn more about becoming a subscriber, please visit our Subscription Services page.


Return
An error has occurred.
Error: Unable to load the Article Details page.